`U.S. Patent No. 10,839,789
`
`Oral Argument, March 12, 2024
`
`Apple Inc. v. Zentian Limited
`Case No. IPR2023-00036
`
`Petitioner’s Demonstrative Exhibits – Not Evidence
`
`Petitioner’s DX-1
`
`IPR2023-00036
`Apple EX1078 Page 1
`
`
`
`Claim 1 and Grounds
`
`- Ground 1: Claims 1, 10-11, 14, and 17
`- Smyth (Ex. 1005) in view of Mozer (Ex. 1046)
`
` Claim 1:
`
`Petition (Pet) (Paper 1), 4, 80
`
`Petitioner’s DX-2
`
`
`
`ICs with Processors and Memories Were
`Ubiquitous
`- Boike: Multiple DSPs
`(each including
`processor and
`memory) on a single IC
`
`- Toyoda: Acoustic Model
`Memory 43 and
`Matching Unit 42
`(“calculating
`apparatus”) both part
`of Sensor Signal
`Processor 31
`
`Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 2, citing Schmandt Dec. (Ex. 1003), ¶¶ 70-76, 168; Pet., 42-44;
`Boike (Ex. 1006), Fig. 1; Toyoda (1029), Fig. 7
`
`Petitioner’s DX-3
`
`
`
`Benefits of a Processor and Memory
`on Single IC
`- Multiple Benefits of ICs (Schmandt Dec., ¶ 76)
`
`Ozcelik (Ex. 1034), 1:47-51
`- Use of a Known Technique (Schmandt Dec., ¶ 167)
`
`“[I]f there’s a known technique to address a known problem using ‘prior art
`elements according to their established functions,’ then there is a motivation to
`combine.”
`
`Intel Corp. v. PACT XPP Schweiz AG, 61 F.4th 1373, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2023)
`
`Schmandt Dec., ¶ 76 (citing Ozcelik, 1:47-51), ¶¶ 167, 231-232; Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 13-14
`
`Petitioner’s DX-4
`
`
`
`Dr. Anderson Admitted Known
`Advantages in the Prior Art
`
`Anderson Depo. Tr. (Ex. 1069), 79:11-14
`
`Anderson Depo. Tr. (Ex. 1069), 91:8-10
`
`Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 1-2
`
`Petitioner’s DX-5
`
`
`
`Dr. Anderson Admitted Known
`Advantages in the Prior Art
`
`Anderson Depo. Tr. (Ex. 1069), 90:23–91:10
`
`Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 1-2; PO Sur-Reply, 10
`
`Petitioner’s DX-6
`
`
`
`Smyth-Mozer Combination for Claim 1(e)
`
`Mozer’s Audio Recognition Peripheral IC 400
`
`Paper 1, 40-41; Mozer (Ex. 1046), Fig. 4 (annotated)
`
`Petitioner’s DX-7
`
`
`
`Mozer’s Stated Advantages of Audio
`Recognition Peripheral 400 on a Single IC
`
`Mozer, 9:15-21
`
`Mozer, 10:46-52
`
`Pet., 42; Schmandt Dec., ¶ 167; Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 14-15
`
`Petitioner’s DX-8
`
`
`
`The Mapped Combination Advantageously
`Avoids a CPU HOLD Signal
`
`Smyth, 6:1-4
`
`Smyth, 6:35-42
`
`State
`Probabilities
`
`Smyth, Fig. 3 (annotated)
`
`From Classifier
`
`Smyth (Ex. 1005), 6:13-15; Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 14-19
`
`Petitioner’s DX-9
`
`Smyth, Fig. 4 (annotated)
`
`
`
`Mr. Schmandt’s Opinions Regarding Use of
`a CPU HOLD Signal
`
`Schmandt Supp. Depo. Tr. (Ex. 2021), 36:2-12
`
`Pet Reply (Paper 21), 16-19; PO Sur-Reply (Paper 27), 8-9
`
`Petitioner’s DX-10
`
`
`
`Zentian’s Unclaimed
`Memory Requirements
`- Dr. Anderson Admitted Claim 1 Does Not Recite a Minimum
`Memory Size
`
`Ex. 1069,
`78:13-19
`
`- Dr. Anderson Assumed the Claims Recite Large Language Model
`
`Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 3-5; Anderson Depo. Tr. (Ex. 1069), 76:24–77:1, 78:13-19
`
`Petitioner’s DX-11
`
`Ex. 1069,
`76:24-
`77:1
`
`
`
`Smyth and the Motorola DSP56000
`
`- Zentian Admitted DSP56000 has 9K Available Memory:
`POR (Paper 19), 8-9;
`Anderson Dec. (Ex. 2020), ¶¶ 41,
`44
`- Smyth Teaches a Recognizer for Recognizing Digits (e.g., 1, 2, …)
`
`Smyth, 6:52-66; Schmandt
`Dec. (Ex. 1003), ¶ 187
`- Dr. Anderson Admitted Smyth Teaches “Abbreviated Model”
`
`Anderson Depo. Tr. (Ex. 1069),
`76:7-23
`
`Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 2-4
`
`Petitioner’s DX-12
`
`
`
`Dr. Anderson Miscalculated Memory Size
`Requirements
`- Dr. Anderson’s Incorrect Triphone
`Calculation
`
`- “tens of thousands” of allophones
`Ex. 2020, 43
`-
`- “2000 allophones” used for calculation
`- 16-40 features per vector (assume 16)
`- 128-320 bytes per state (assume 128)
`- 2000 allophones * 3 states = 6000 states
`- 6000 states * 128 bytes = 768,000 bytes
`- “more than 720 kBytes”
`- Ex. 2020, 43
`- “more than 750 kBytes”
`- POR, 9
`
`- Smyth’s Tristate Allophone
`Calculation for Large
`Language Model
`- Tristate - 3 states per allophone
`- ~50 allophones ~150 states
`- 8 MFCC per feature vector
`- 4 bytes per Real variable
`- 8 MFCC * 4 bytes = 32 bytes per
`state
`- 150 states * 32 bytes = 4,800
`bytes
`- 4,800 bytes < 9,000 bytes
`Zentian admitted for
`Motorola DSP56000’s
`memory
`
`Pet. Reply (Paper 21), 5-10; Ex. 1068, 3-6; Paper 1, 16-17; Smyth, 5:30-6:52;
`POR (Paper 19), 8-9; Anderson Depo. Tr. (Ex. 1069), 76:19–78:12; Anderson Dec. (Ex. 2020), ¶ 43
`
`Petitioner’s DX-13
`
`
`
`The Claims Do Not Require a POSITA to
`Fabricate the IC
`- Zentian’s Admissions:
`
`“Ordinary artisans in the
`field of speech recognition
`are simply consumers of
`integrated circuits
`fabricated by others….”
`
`“The claims recite a
`single IC that has already
`been fabricated; they do
`not require a POSA to
`fabricate such an IC or
`know how to do so[.]”
`
`Anderson Dec (Ex. 2020), ¶ 61;
`Paper 19, 18
`
`PO Sur Reply (Paper 27), 12
`
`- Specification silent on how to fabricate an IC
`
`- Smyth, Mozer, and Toyoda teach operable, already-fabricated ICs
`
`Pet. Reply, 22-25
`
`Petitioner’s DX-14
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
