throbber
From: James Murphy
`
`To: Trials
`
`Cc: Corey Casey; Sitzman, Mike; Best, Tim; Raymond.Miller; Endejann, Nicole; Tobin, David; Chad Landmon; Mark
`Deming
`
`Subject: IPR2025-00464, -465, -466: Petitioner"s Request for Authorization to File a Motion to Strike Declarations
`
`Date: Thursday, February 26, 2026 12:10:25 PM
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`Petitioner requests authorization to file a motion to strike the declarations of Messrs. Cartt, Mitchnick
`and Hale in the above referenced IPRs given Patent Owner’s refusal to permit the declarants’
`deposition in these IPR proceedings pursuant to 37 CFR 842.51(b)(1)(ii). Patent Owner opposes and
`requests the opportunity to file an opposition in the event the Board grants Petitioner’s request to file
`such a motion.
`
`On February 2nd, Petitioner accepted Patent Owner’s proposed deposition dates for these witnesses
`but on February 10th, Patent Owner notified Petitioner that it was cancelling the depositions. Patent
`Owner indicated that it does not see any basis for Petitioner taking these depositions in these IPR
`proceedings in view of the Board’s February 6th Order denying leave to file a certificate of correction
`and because Petitioner can depose these witnesses in the underlying litigation (and use the
`deposition transcripts from the litigation in this proceeding). Petitioner does not believe either the
`Board’s February 6th Order or the availability of depositions in the underlying litigation absolves
`Patent Owner of its obligations in the IPR under 37 CFR 842.51(b)(1)(ii). Notonly is Patent Owner
`seeking Director review of the February 6" Order, but the litigation schedule does not align with the
`schedule in this proceeding. In addition, protective orders issued in this IPR and the litigation creates
`logistical issues making Patent Owner’s proposal unworkable. The parties continued
`correspondence on this issue has not led to any resolution.
`
`Regards,
`James Murphy
`Shareholder
`
`jpmurphy@polsinelli.com
`713.374.1631
`
`1000 Louisiana Street
`Sixty-Fourth Floor
`Houston, TX 77002
`
`olsinelli.com
`
`Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This electronic mail message contains CONFIDENTIAL information which is (a) ATTORNEY - CLIENT
`PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION, WORK PRODUCT, PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE
`PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE, and (b) intended only for the use of the Addressee(s)
`named herein. If you are not an Addressee, or the person responsible for delivering this to an Addressee,
`you are hereby notified that reading, copying, or distributing this message is prohibited. If you have
`received this electronic mail message in error, please reply to the sender and take the steps necessary to
`delete the message completely from your computer system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket