throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`APPROVAL PACKAGE FOR:
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`21-549
`
`Approval Letter(s)
`
`HELSINN EXHIBIT 2002
`Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Page 1 of 6 IPR2025-00945
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SERVIC,
`*,.ul s, ¢
`
`_( DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Ssrvice
`
`")
`*
`
`o WEALTY
`“ .
`2
`
`O
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-549
`
`Merck & Company, Inc. -
`
`Attention: Steven A. Aurecchia, M.D.
`Sumneytown Pike
`
`P.O. Box 4, BLA-20
`
`West Point, PA 19486
`
`Dear Dr. Aurecchia:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated September 27, 2002, received
`
`September 27, 2002, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for
`EMEND® (aprepitant) Capsules.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated November 5, November 19, November 25, and
`December 27, 2002 and January 6, January 7, January 8, January 15, January 16, January 22. Februar
`
`12, February 14, February 27, March 11, March 14, March 17, March 18, March 19, March 20, <
`March 21. March 24, and March 26, 2003.
`
`This new drug application provides for the use of EMEND® (aprepitant) Capsules in combination wizz
`other antiemetic agents, for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with
`initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy, including high-dose cisplatin.
`
`We completed our review of this application, as amended. It is approved, effective on the date of this
`letter, for use as recommended in the agreed-upon labeling text.
`
`The final printed labeling (FPL) must be identical to the enclosed labeling (text for the packa
`
`packaze Inser.
`
`and text for the patient package insert) and submitted labeling (immediate container and carton label:
`
`submitted February 27, 2003). Marketing the product with FPL that is not identical to the approved
`labeling text may render the product misbranded and an unapproved new drug.
`
`Please submit an electronic version of the FPL according to the guidance for industry titled Providinz
`Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format - NDA. Alternatively, you may submit 20 paper copizs
`of the FPL as soon as it is available but no more than 30 days after it is printed. Individually mount =22
`of the copies on heavy-weight paper or similar material. For administrative purposes, designate this
`
`submission “FPL for approved NDA 21-549.” Approval of this submission by FDA is not requirec
`before the labeling is used.
`
`We remind you of your postmarketing study commitments in your submission dated March 24, 200>
`These commitments are listed below.
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA 21-549
`Page 2
`
`1. Commitment #1
`
`Merck will obtain pharmacokinetic interaction data on a total of 10 patients receiving
`concomitant aprepitant and docetaxel (an IV chemotherapy CYP3A4 subtrate), instead of
`the originally planned 20 patients (Protocol 051, Serial No. 242, IND
`
`The timeline is as follows:
`
`¢ Completion of patient portion (N = 10) 4™ Quarter 2003
`e Submission of Clinical Study Report 2" Quarter 2004
`2. Commitment #2
`
`Merck will conduct a drug interaction study to evaluate the effect of aprepitant on either
`vinorelbine or irinotecan.
`
`The timeline is as follows:
`
`e Protocol Submission ' 1* Quarter 2004
`
`¢ Completion of patient portion of study 4™ Quarte: 2005
`
`¢ Submission of Clinical Study Report 3" Quarter 2006
`3. Commitment #3
`
`Merck will conduct a drug interaction study in healthy subjects, including some who are
`CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, to evaluate the effect of aprepitant on dolasetron.
`
`The timeline is as follows:
`
`e Draft Clinical Study Protocol to FDA 4" Quarter 2003
`¢ Completion of patient portion of study 2" Quarter 2004
`e Submission of Clinical Study Report 4™ Quarter 2004
`4. Commitment #4
`
`Merck will initiate a risk management program as outlined in the submission to NDA 21-549 dated
`March 18, 2003, to ensure that health care providers understand the approved indication for EMEND
`and precautions with its use and to address and minimize potential for confusion with AMEN or
`VFEND and EMEND. Merck will submit all medication error reports relating to tradename confusion.
`both potential and actual, that occur with EMEND for a period of one year following the date of
`approval. All actual and potential errors will be submitted as 15-day reports regardless of patient
`
`outcome. Merck agrees to evaluate these data with FDA and, if needed, to implement intervention to
`further minimize risk of medication errors.
`
`For the duration of the program, Merck also commits to providing the following: 1) reports on the
`proactive surveillance audit with retail pharmacists on a quarterly basis beginning no later that the
`fourth quarter of 2003; 2) an annual summary report beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004.
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA 21-549
`Page 3
`
`S. Commitment #5
`
`Merck will submit to FDA a report on the assessment of the inhibitory properties of
`aprepitant on CYP2C8 and CYP2B6 in vitro in human liver microsomes.
`
`The timeline is as follows:
`¢ Submission of final report to FDA 2" Quarter 2003
`
`6. Commitment #6
`
`Merck commits to justify the use of . ~ —
`method, including studies on the . _— for he nanoparticle
`
`formulation. Accordingly, based on the data presented in the response, the dissolution
`specification will be reviewed and, if warranted, revised.
`
`The timeline is as follows:
`e Submission of information to FDA 2nd Quarter 2003
`
`Submiit clinical protocols to your IND for this product. Submit nonclinical and chemistry,
`manufacturing, and controls protocols and all study final reports to this NDA. In addition, under 21
`CFR 314.81(b)(2)(vii) and 314.81(b)(2)(viii), you should include a status summary of each :
`commitment in your annual report to this NDA. The status summary should include expected
`summary completion and final report submission dates, any changes in plans since the last annual
`report, and, for clinical studies, number of patients entered into each study. All submissions, including
`supplements, relating to these postmarketing study commitments must be prominently labeled
`
`“Postmarketing Study Protocol”, “Postmarketing Study Final Report”, or “Postmarketing Study
`Correspondence.” :
`
`FDA's Pediatric Rule [at 21 CFR 314.55/21 CFR 601.27] was challenzed in court. On October 17.
`2002, the court ruled that FDA did not have the authority to issue the Pediatric Rule and has barred
`FDA trom enforcing it. Although the government decided not to pursue an appeal in the courts, it wii
`work with Congress in an effort to enact legislation requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to condu2:
`appropriate pediatric clinical trials. In addition, third party interveners have decided to appeal the
`court's decision striking down the rule. Therefore, we encourage you to submit a pediatric plan tha:
`describes development of your product in the pediatric population where it may be used. Please be
`aware that whether or not this pediatric plan and subsequent submission of pediatric data will be
`required depends upon passage of legislation or the success of the third party appeal. In any event. w2
`hope you will decide to submit a pediatric plan and conduct the appropriate pediatric studies to provide
`important information on the safe and effective use of this drug in the relevant pediatric populations.
`
`The pediatric exclusivity provisions of FDAMA as reauthorized by the Best Pharmaceuticals for
`Children Act are not affected by the court's ruling. Pediatric studies conducted under the terms of
`section 303A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act may result in additional marketing
`exclusivity for certain products. You should refer to the Guidance for Industry on Qualifying for
`Pediatric Exclusivity (available on our web site at www.fda.gov/cder/pediatric) for details. If you wish
`to qualify for pediatric exclusivity you should submit a "Proposed Pediatric Study Request”. FDA
`generally does not consider studies submitted to an NDA before issuance of a Written Request as
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA 21-549
`Page 4
`
`responsive to the Written Request. Applicants should obtain a Written Request before submitting
`pediatric studies to an NDA.
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to
`this division and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane ‘
`
`Rockville, MD 20857
`Please submit one market package of the drug product when it is available.
`
`We have not completed validation of the regulatory methods. However, we expect vour continued
`cooperation to resolve any problems that may be identified.
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`
`314.80 and 314.81).
`If you have any questions, call Brian Strongin, R.Ph., M.B.A., Regulatory Project Manager at (301) .
`827-7473.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See ap!r&/ electronic signarure page}
`
`Florence Houn, M.D.
`
`Director
`
`Office of Drug Evaluation III
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Enclosure
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Julie Beitz
`3/26/03 09:52:36 AM
`Julie Beitz MD signing for Florence Houn MD
`
`Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket