throbber
proceedings of the Symposium on Contemporary Issues in
`Hodgkin’s Disease: Biology, Staging, and Treatment
`
`Cancer Clinical Investigation Review Committee
`National Cancer Institute
`
`Organizing Committee: Clara D. Bloomfield
`Stephen E. Jones
`Bruce A. Peterson
`
`September 9-12, 1982
`San Francisco, California
`
`HELSINN EXHIBIT 2083
`Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`Page 1 of 2 IPR2025-00947
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Combination Antiemetics
`
`Nausea and vomiting secondary to agents such
`as cisplatin are a major cause of morbidity in cancer
`chemotherapy (1). Gastrointestinal upset occurs in
`as many as 83% of these patients and may, in fact,
`be the limiting factor in chemotherapy (2). At the
`present time, only three major drug classes have
`been considered to be effective antiemetics: anti-
`histamines, anticholinergics, and dopamine antag-
`onists. These drugs are thought to act on the chemo-
`receptor trigger zone and/or emetic center in the
`medulla oblongata (2) where recent neuropharma-
`cologic techniques have demonstrated the presence
`of histamine H, (3), muscarinic cholinergic (4), and
`dopamine (5) receptors. However, no single agent
`has yet proved to be effective in relieving severe
`nausea and vomiting. It thus follows logically that
`antiemetic efficacy might be improved by combining
`drug effects at all three proposed sites of action.
`
`Morran et al (1) reported that the combination of
`fluphenazine and nortriptyline significantly reduced
`the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting
`during cancer chemotherapy. The effectiveness of
`nortriptyline, an antidepressant, was thought to be
`related “to the relief of psychiatric morbidity which
`is common in patients receiving chemotherapy” (1).
`More likely, nortriptyline’s antiemetic actions de-
`rive from its potent antihistamine and anticholin-
`ergic properties which have been documented in
`neurotransmitter receptor binding studies (6). In
`combination with fluphenazine, simultaneous block-
`ade of histamine H,, muscarinic cholinergic, and do-
`pamine receptors occurs.
`
`Other evidence also supports this hypothesis. Eight
`oncology patients at Stanford University Hospital
`were treated with prochlorperazine (10 mg iv every
`4 hours) and diphenhydramine (25 mg iv every 4
`hours) beginning 30 minutes prior to a 24-hour cis-
`platin infusion. Each patient had previously re-
`ceived between two and 11 cycles of cisplatin. Seven
`of the eight patients reported subjective prefer-
`ences for the drug combination over any single agent
`used during prior chemotherapy cycles. The eighth
`patient denied any significant decrease in the amount
`of nausea and vomiting experienced during the cis-
`platin infusion. As with fluphenazine and nortrip-
`tyline, the simultaneous use of prochlorperazine and
`diphenhydramine results in blockade of dopamine,
`
`LETTERS
`
`muscarinic cholinergie, and histamine H, receptors.
`In summary, dopamine, cholinergic, and hista-
`mine antagonists all display antiemetic actions which
`are mediated via different pathways (2). Current
`neuropharmacologic techniques such as receptor
`binding assays provide a rapid and accurate meas-
`ure of antiemetic effects at central nervous system
`receptor sites. It seems logical to employ these tech-
`niques to maximize antiemetic actions in the central
`emetic pathway. We are presently conducting a clin-
`ical trial to further investigate this hypothesis.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. MorrAN C, SmiTH DC, ANDERSON DA, ET AL. Incidence of
`nausea and vomiting with cytotoxic chemotherapy: a pro-
`spective randomised trial of antiemetics. Br Med J 1:1323—
`1324, 1979.
`
`2. SEIGEL LJ, and LoNGo DL. The control of chemotherapy
`induced emesis. Ann Intern Med 95:352-359, 1981.
`
`3. ParacrosJM, WaMsLEYJK, and KUuHAR MJ. The distribution
`of histamine-H, receptors in the rat brain: an autoradi-
`ographic study. Neuroscience 6:15-37, 1981.
`
`4. WaMmsLEY JK, LEwis MS, Younc WS, III, ET AL. Autoradi-
`ographic localization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in rat
`brainstem. J Neurosci Res 1:176-191, 1981.
`
`5. STEFANINI E, and CLEMENT-CORMIER Y. Detection of dopa-
`mine receptors in the area postrema. EurJ Pharmacol 74:257—
`260, 1981.
`
`6. PErROUTKA SJ, and SNYDER SH. Long-term antidepressant
`treatment decreases spiroperidol-labeled serotonin receptor
`binding. Science 210:88-90, 1980.
`
`Stephen J. Peroutka
`
`Department of Neuroscience
`The Johns Hopkins University
`School of Medicine
`
`725 N Wolfe St
`
`Baltimore, MD 21205
`
`January 18, 1982
`
`Streptozocin-Induced Eosinophilia and
`Fever: A Case Report!
`
`Streptozocin, a nitrosourea compound, has been
`used alone or with 5-FU to treat pancreatic islet
`cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumors (1-4). Its major
`toxic effects are renal and gastrointestinal. Uremia
`
`!Supported by a grant from the General Clinical Research
`Centers Branch (RR-53).
`
`Cancer Treatment Reports Vol. 66, No. 6, June 1982 1449
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket