throbber
Completed
`Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC
`Patients (MyRisk) (CINV)
`ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04817189
`SponsorHelsinn Healthcare SA
`Information provided by Helsinn Healthcare SA (Responsible Party)
`Last Update Posted 2024-12-04
`Study Details Tab
`Study Overview
`Brief Summary
`MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of
`developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.
`Antiemetic guidelines recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy.
`Chemotherapy (CT) agents are divided in Highly, Moderately, Low and Minimally Emetogenic potential.
`In addition to type of chemotherapy, several patient-related risk factors can increase the risk of CINV
`(chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting). Currently, there is limited consensus surrounding the
`most relevant patient risk factors that may predict the risk of CINV. Based on a recent study by
`Dranitsaris et al. (Dranitsaris et al. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1; 28(6):1260-1267.), eight (8) predictive factors
`have been identified and an algorithm has been developed to incorporate these factors into the optimal
`selection of prophylactic antiemetics:
`The U.S. government does not review or approve the safety and science of all studies
`listed on this website.
`Read our full disclaimer(https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/disclaimer) for details.
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 1/26
`HELSINN EXHIBIT 2026
`Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`IPR2025-00948
`Page 1 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1.nausea and/or v omiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
`2.use of non-pr
`escribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
`3.platinum or anthr
`acycline-based chemotherapy
`4.age < 60 y
`ears
`5.expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or v
`omiting
`6.<7 h of sleep the night befor
`e chemotherapy
`7.hist
`ory of morning sickness during previous pregnancy
`8.cy
`cle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified
`where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from
`cycle 3 onward).
`The clinical application of this prediction tool has the potential to be an important resource for
`clinicians and may help to enhance patient care by optimizing the use of the antiemetics in a proactive
`manner.
`Antiemetic guideline recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of chemotherapy and
`involve 4 levels of classification of intravenous chemotherapy agents, i.e., high, moderate, low and
`minimal; these have been accepted by major organisations. Moderate emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)
`results in acute vomiting in 30% to 90% of cancer patients in the absence of antiemetic therapy. In
`addition to the chemotherapy type, several patient-related risk factors and clinical characteristics can
`increase CINV risk. These can include use of antiemetics inconsistent with international guidelines,
`younger age, prechemotherapy nausea, no complete CINV response in an earlier cycle, history of
`nausea/vomiting, (trait) anxiety, fatigue experience, and expectations of nausea/vomiting. Other studies
`have largely confirmed some of the key risk factors for CINV (history of vomiting during pregnancy,
`history of motion sickness, age, gender) and added other factors such as (chronic) alcohol
`consumption, body surface area, fewer hours slept the night prior to infusion, or advanced stage cancer.
`Currently, there is a limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may
`predict CINV risk. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. eight predictive factors have been
`identified, and an algorithm has been developed to combine these patient-related risk factors into the
`optimal treatment of prophylactic antiemetics. These include:
`1.nausea and/or v
`omiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
`2.use of non-pr
`escribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
`3.platinum or anthr
`acycline-based chemotherapy
`4.age < 60 y
`ears
`5.expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or v
`omiting
`6.<7 h of sleep the night befor
`e chemotherapy
`7.hist
`ory of morning sickness during previous pregnancy
`8.cy
`cle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified
`where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from
`cycle 3 onward).
`Detailed Description
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 2/26
`Page 2 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Akynzeo®, an oral combination of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RA), netupitant and the 5-
`hydroxytryptamine (HT3) receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA), palonosetron, is recommended by guidelines
`for the prevention of CINV. Akynzeo® has been evaluated in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind,
`double-dummy phase II clinical trial at various dose ranges among 694 cisplatin-treated cancer patients
`from 44 sites (two countries); each NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) dose significantly improves CINV
`prevention in cancer patients. Similar results were obtained in another international, randomised,
`double-blind and parallel group phase III clinical trial; NEPA prevented CINV in patients receiving MEC.
`The current study primarily aimed to evaluate whether Akynzeo® leads to a higher response rate
`compared with standard care in MEC regimen-treated patients who are identified to be at high risk
`based on the algorithm.
`Official Title
`MyRisk: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Oral Akynzeo® in Patients Receiving MEC At High Risk of
`Developing CINV Based on a Prediction Tool: a Multinational and Multicenter Study
`Conditions
`Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting
`Intervention / Treatment
`Drug: NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron)
`Drug: Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR
`Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or
`IV)
`Drug: Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose
`Other Study ID Numbers
`Study Start (Actual)
`2021-02-01
`Primary Completion (Actual)
`2024-07-02
`Study Completion (Actual)
`2024-07-02
`Enrollment (Actual)
`414
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 3/26
`Page 3 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Study Type
`Interventional
`Phase
`Phase 4
`Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine
`MedlinePlus(https://medlineplus.gov/) related topics:  Nausea and
`Vomiting(https://medlineplus.gov/nauseaandvomiting.html)
`Drug Information(https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/) available for: 
`Dexamethasone(https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/search.cfm?
`labeltype=human&query=Dexamethasone)
`Palonosetron(https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/search.cfm?
`labeltype=human&query=Palonosetron)
`FDA Drug and Device Resources(https://clinicaltrials.gov/fda-links)
`Contacts and Locations
`This section provides contact details for people who can answer questions about joining this study, and
`information on where this study is taking place.
`To learn more, please see the Contacts and Locations section in How to Read a Study
`Record(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study-basics/how-to-read-study-record#contacts-and-locations).
`This study has 19 locations
`China
`Shanghai, China
`Shanghai Chest Hospital
`Shanghai, China
`Shanghai Ninth People´s Hospital
`Shanghai, China
`Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 4/26
`Page 4 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Czechia
`Prague, Czechia
`General University Hospital in Prague
`Praha, Czechia, 14059
`Thomayerova nemocnice
`Germany
`Essen, Germany
`Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte
`Mannheim, Germany
`Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
`München, Germany
`München Klinik Neuperlach
`Paderborn, Germany
`Frauenklinik St. Louise
`Potsdam, Germany
`Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gemeinnützige
`GmbH
`Greece
`Athens, Greece
`Sotiria General Hospital, 3rd Deúpartment of
`Medicine, School of Medicine, National and
`Kapodistrian University of Athens
`Heraklion, Greece
`General University Hospital of Heraklion
`Spain
`A Coruña, Spain, 15006
`Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
`Barcelona, Spain, 0802
`Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
`Madrid, Spain, 28007
`Hospital General Universitario Gregorio
`Marañón
`Salamanca, Spain, 37007
`Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
`Switzerland
`Basel, Switzerland
`University Hospital Basel
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 5/26
`Page 5 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Genolier, Switzerland
`Swiss Medical Network - Clinique de Genolier
`United Kingdom
`London, United Kingdom
`The Royal Marsden Hospital
`Participation Criteria
`Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of
`these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
`For general information about clinical research, read Learn About
`Studies(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study-basics/learn-about-studies).
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 6/26
`Page 6 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eligibility Criteria
`Description
`Inclusion Criteria:
`Adult patients aged ≥18 years
`Patients with a risk score of ≥ 13 as calculated by the algorithm - see 3.6.3.1.
`Baseline/screening: VISIT 0
`Signed Informed consent
`Both sexes
`Patients with diagnosis of any cancer scheduled and intended to be treated for three
`consecutive cycles with a single dose of any IV MEC regimen, per cycle, including adjuvant
`or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
`Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2
`Use of Standard of Care defined as a 5-HT3 RA + Dexamethasone (or equivalent
`corticosteroid) based-regimen on day 1 of chemotherapy for CINV prevention
`Naïve and non- naïve to chemotherapy
`The enrolled women should be a) of non-childbearing potential or b) of childbearing
`potential using reliable contraceptive measures and having a negative urine pregnancy test
`done by health care team within 1-24 hours before dosing the antiemetic treatment in both
`arms and outcome recorded in the medical records
`Able to comply with study requirements
`Exclusion Criteria:
`Patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (including
`anthracycline+cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy)
`Patients receiving oral moderately emetogenic chemotherapy drugs
`Patients receiving opioids within 2 weeks prior to trial enrollment (longer use allowed)
`Use of olanzapine as prophylaxis of CINV
`Patients scheduled to receive radiotherapy concurrently with chemotherapy
`Any illness or condition that, in the opinion of the physician, may confound the results of the
`study or pose unwarranted risks in administering the investigational product to the patient.
`Patients with mechanical risk factors for nausea (i.e. intestinal obstruction)
`Patients with liver disease (as nausea is a common presenting symptom)
`Patients with metabolic risk factors for nausea (i.e. electrolyte imbalances causing
`nausea/vomiting)
`Chronic treatment with steroids (with the exception of inhaled or topical steroids)
`Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding women
`Women of childbearing potential refusing to use effective contraception during the whole
`study treatment and up to one month after study treatment with Akynzeo®
`Use of Standard of Care including an NK-1 RA-based regimen to prevent CINV
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 7/26
`Page 7 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ages Eligible for Study
`18 Years and older (Adult,  Older Adult)
`Sexes Eligible for Study
`All
`Accepts Healthy Volunteers
`No
`Study Plan
`This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study
`is measuring.
`How is the study designed?
`Design Details
`Primary Purpose : Supportive Care
`Allocation : Randomized
`Interventional Model : Parallel Assignment
`Interventional Model Description: interventional, open label, randomized, active controlled,
`parallel arms, multicenter and multinational study
`Masking : None (Open Label)
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 8/26
`Page 8 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Arms and Interventions
`Participant Group/ArmIntervention/Treatment
`Experimental: NEPA
`(300mg
`netupitant/0.5mg
`palonosetron) +
`Dexamethasone 8 mg
`Oral
`netupitant/palonosetron
`(300 mg/0.50 mg) fixed-
`dose combination on
`Day 1 of each cycle.
`Dexamethasone (8 mg)
`will be administered on
`Day 1 of each cycle.
`Drug: NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg
`palonosetron)
`Oral netupitant/palonosetron (300 mg/0.50
`mg) fixed-dose combination on Day 1 of each
`cycle.
`Other Names:
`Akynzeo® capsules
`Drug: Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV
`dose
`Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered
`on Day 1 of each cycle.
`Other Names:
`corticosteroid
`Active Comparator:
`Standard of care +
`Dexamethasone 8 mg
`Dexamethasone (or
`equivalent
`corticosteroids) 8 mg
`administered by the oral
`route (or equivalent IV
`dose) on Day 1,
`approximately 1 hour
`before chemotherapy
`and one of the 5-HT3-
`RAs recommended by
`European Society for
`Medical Oncology
`Drug: Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR
`Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR
`Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR
`Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral
`or IV)
`Standard of care will be administered on Day
`1 of each cycle.
`Other Names:
`5-HT3 RA
`Drug: Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV
`dose
`Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered
`on Day 1 of each cycle.
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 9/26
`Page 9 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`What is the study measuring?
`Primary Outcome Measures
`(ESMO) and
`Multinational
`Association of
`Supportive Care in
`Cancer (MASCC)
`guidelines (standard of
`care), i.e. either:
`Granisetron, 2 mg (oral)
`or 1 mg (IV) OR
`Palonosetron, 0.5 mg
`(oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR
`Ondansetron, 16 mg
`(oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR
`Dolasetron 100 mg
`(oral) OR Tropisetron 5
`mg (oral or IV)
`Other Names:
`corticosteroid
`Outcome
`Measure Measure Description Time
`Frame
`The proportion
`of complete
`responses over
`three cycles of
`chemotherapy
`after the start
`of the MEC
`administration
`To evaluate if the use of NEPA (netupitant and
`palonosetron) in patients treated with IV
`moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and at
`high risk of CINV is more effective in
`preventing CINV than a standard of care
`antiemetics over three cycles of chemotherapy.
`At the
`end of
`all three
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 10/26
`Page 10 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Secondary Outcome Measures
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Outcome
`Measure Measure Description Time
`Frame
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 11/26
`Page 11 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation of
`acute (0 to 24
`hours), delayed
`(>24 to 120
`hours), and
`overall (0-120
`hours) CINV
`indicators in
`each cycle of
`chemotherapy
`Proportion of:
`No emetic episode during the acute,
`delayed, and overall phase and daily in
`each cycle
`Number of vomiting episodes during the
`acute, delayed, and overall phase in each
`cycle
`No rescue medication during the acute,
`delayed, and overall phase and daily in
`each cycle
`No significant nausea (maximum MAT
`scale = 2) during the acute, delayed, and
`overall phase and daily in each cycle;
`No nausea (MAT scale = 0) during the
`acute, delayed, and overall phase and
`daily in each cycle;
`Complete protection (no emetic episode,
`no rescue medication, and no significant
`nausea) during the acute, delayed, and
`overall phase and daily in each cycle
`Time 0 is defined as the start time of the
`chemotherapy administration on Day 1 of each
`of the three cycles.
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`the predictive
`role of potential
`risk factors in
`the
`development of
`CINV over three
`cycles of
`chemotherapy
`Analysis of the development of CINV as a
`dependent variable will be performed to
`identify additional potential risk factors of CINV
`thought to be increasing the risk of CINV in
`patients receiving MEC.
`The outcome measure is the development of
`CINV, defined as any occurrence of nausea or a
`vomiting episode.
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 12/26
`Page 12 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The data on the development of CINV will be
`taken from data collection tools, patients'
`diaries and MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT).
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`the safety
`profile of the
`antiemetic drug
`over three
`cycles of
`chemotherapy -
`the frequency
`of adverse
`events (AE)
`An overall summary of adverse events (AE) will
`be presented, including the frequency of
`patients with:
`Any treatment-emergent adverse event
`Any treatment-emergent adverse event
`related to a study drug
`Any treatment-emergent adverse event
`leading to chemotherapy dose reductions
`or interruptions
`Any treatment-emergent serious adverse
`event
`All AEs will be summarized by their:
`Severity
`Seriousness
`Relationship to a drug
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 13/26
`Page 13 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation of
`the safety
`profile of the
`antiemetic drug
`over three
`cycles of
`chemotherapy -
`the percentage
`of adverse
`events (AE)
`An overall summary of adverse events (AE) will
`be presented, including the percentage of
`patients with:
`Any treatment-emergent adverse event
`Any treatment-emergent adverse event
`related to a study drug
`Any treatment-emergent adverse event
`leading to chemotherapy dose reductions
`or interruptions
`Any treatment-emergent serious adverse
`event
`All AEs will be summarized by their:
`Severity
`Seriousness
`Relationship to a drug
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`the frequency
`of
`discontinuation
`s due to
`adverse events
`The frequency of discontinuations due to
`adverse events (AE) will be presented.
`All AEs leading to discontinuation will be
`summarized by their:
`Severity
`Seriousness
`Relationship to a drug
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 14/26
`Page 14 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`the percentage
`of
`discontinuation
`s due to
`adverse events
`The percentage of patients with
`discontinuations due to adverse events (AE)
`will be presented.
`All AEs leading to discontinuation will be
`summarized by their:
`Severity
`Seriousness
`Relationship to a drug
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`frequency of on
`treatment
`deaths due to
`adverse events
`The frequency of on treatment deaths due to
`adverse events (AE) will be presented.
`All AEs leading to on treatment deaths will be
`summarized by their:
`Severity
`Seriousness
`Relationship to a drug
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 15/26
`Page 15 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`the percentage
`of patients with
`on treatment
`death due to
`adverse events
`The percentage of patients with on treatment
`death due to adverse events (AE) will be
`presented.
`All AEs leading to on treatment death will be
`summarized by their:
`Severity
`Seriousness
`Relationship to a drug
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Listings
`concerning the
`safety profile of
`the antiemetic
`drug over three
`The following listings will be presented:
`All AEs (including pre-treatment AEs)
`Serious adverse events
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 16/26
`Page 16 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cycles of
`chemotherapy
`Adverse events resulting in withdrawn of
`study drug
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Exploration of
`the effect of
`CINV on daily
`activities and
`quality of life in
`patients
`receiving
`moderately-
`emetogenic
`chemotherapy
`over three
`cycles of
`chemotherapy
`Evaluation of the effect of CINV on daily
`activities and quality of life that will be
`measured by using the Functional Living Index-
`Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire, a validated,
`nausea and vomiting specific, patient-reported
`outcome instrument.
`The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) has
`18 questions. These questions are divided into
`two domains: Nausea (questions 1-9) and
`Vomiting (questions 10-18).
`The minimum score for any question is 0 and
`the maximum score is 100. Higher scores
`indicate less impairment on daily life as a
`result of nausea or vomiting.
`At the
`end of
`all 3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 17/26
`Page 17 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome -
`number of days
`with rescue
`medication
`administered
`for the
`treatment of
`CINV
`Health economic endpoint, the number of days
`with rescue medication administered for the
`treatment of CINV, will be evaluated during the
`study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - daily
`doses of
`rescue
`medication
`administered
`for the
`Health economic endpoint, the daily doses of
`rescue medication administered for the
`treatment of CINV, will be evaluated during the
`study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 18/26
`Page 18 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`treatment of
`CINV
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - the
`number of re-
`hydration bags
`Health economic endpoint, the number of re-
`hydration bags given for at least grade 2
`vomiting (more details below), will be evaluated
`during the study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 19/26
`Page 19 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - the
`number of days
`of unplanned
`hospitalisation
`s
`Health economic endpoint, the number of days
`of unplanned hospitalizations related to CINV,
`will be evaluated during the study cycles
`All hospitalizations will be summarized
`according to the department of hospitalization
`(type of ward)
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - the
`number of
`outpatient
`physician visits
`Health economic endpoint, the number of
`outpatient physician visits and health care
`consultations due to CINV (e.g., general
`practitioner), will be evaluated during the study
`cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 20/26
`Page 20 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - the
`number of
`unplanned
`laboratory test
`Health economic endpoint, the number of
`unplanned laboratory test including those at
`unplanned hospitalizations due to CINV, will be
`evaluated during the study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 21/26
`Page 21 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome -
`discontinuation
`of
`chemotherapy
`treatment due
`to CINV
`Health economic endpoint, the number of
`discontinuations of chemotherapy treatment
`due to CINV, will be evaluated during the study
`cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - the
`number of
`delays of
`chemotherapy
`administration
`due to CINV
`Health economic endpoint, the number of
`delays of chemotherapy administration due to
`CINV, will be evaluated during the study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 22/26
`Page 22 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - the
`average length
`of delay of
`chemotherapy
`administration
`due to CINV
`Health economic endpoint, the average length
`of delay (in days) of chemotherapy
`administration due to CINV, will be evaluated
`during the study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 23/26
`Page 23 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Collaborators and Investigators
`This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
`Helsinn Healthcare SA
`Evaluation of
`resource
`utilization and
`health
`economic
`outcome - days
`of absence
`from work
`Health economic endpoint, the number of days
`of absence from work, will be evaluated during
`the study cycles
`At the
`end of
`each
`cycle
`and
`after all
`3
`chemot
`herapy
`cycles.
`The
`length
`of a
`cycle
`depend
`s on the
`treatme
`nt being
`given
`(cycles
`range
`from 2
`to 6
`weeks).
`Sponsor
`Investigators
`Study Chair:Alex Molasiotis, prof.,University of Derby
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 24/26
`Page 24 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Study Record Dates
`These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov.
`Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure
`they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
`Study Registration Dates
`First Submitted
`2021-03-01
`First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
`2021-03-24
`First Posted
`2021-03-26
`Study Record Updates
`Last Update Submitted that met QC Criteria
`2024-12-02
`Last Update Posted
`2024-12-04
`Last Verified
`2024-12
`More Information
`Terms related to this study
`HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
`Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
`Signs and Symptoms, Digestive
`Vomiting
`Anti-Inflammatory Agents
`Antiemetics
`Autonomic Agents
`Peripheral Nervous System Agents
`Physiological Effects of Drugs
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 25/26
`Page 25 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plan for Individual Participant Data (IPD)
`Drug and device information, study documents, and helpful links
`Gastrointestinal Agents
`Glucocorticoids
`Hormones
`Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
`Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
`Antineoplastic Agents
`Antipruritics
`Dermatologic Agents
`Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
`Serotonin Antagonists
`Serotonin Agents
`Neurotransmitter Agents
`Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
`Dexamethasone
`Ondansetron
`Palonosetron
`Granisetron
`Tropisetron
`Dolasetron
`Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
`No
`Studies a U.S. FDA-Regulated Drug Product
`No
`Studies a U.S. FDA-Regulated Device Product
`No
`Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
`No
`8/3/25, 4:06 PM Study Details | Oral Akynzeo® Vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk) | ClinicalTrials.gov
`https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04817189 26/26
`Page 26 of 26
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket