throbber
Pharmacological Profile of (2R-trans)-4-[1-[3,5-
`bis(Trifluoromethyl)benzoyl]-2-(phenylmethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N-
`(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-1-acetamide (S)-Hydroxybutanedioate
`(R116301), an Orally and Centrally Active Neurokinin-1
`Receptor Antagonist
`A. A. H. P. MEGENS, D. ASHTON, J. C. A. VERMEIRE, P. C. M. VERMOTE, K. A. HENS, L. C. HILLEN,
`J. F. FRANSEN, M. MAHIEU, L. HEYLEN, J. E. LEYSEN, M. R. JURZAK, and F. JANSSENS
`Department of Discovery Research Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
`Received February 6, 2002; accepted April 9, 2002
`ABSTRACT
`In comparison with a series of reference compounds, (2R-trans)-
`4-[1-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl]-2-(phenylmethyl)-4-piperidi-
`nyl]-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-1-acetamide (S)-Hydroxybutanedio-
`ate (R116301) was characterized as a specific, orally, and centrally
`active neurokinin-1 (NK
`1) receptor antagonist with subnanomolar
`affinity for the human NK1 receptor (Ki: 0.45 nM) and over 200-fold
`selectivity toward NK2 and NK3 receptors. R116301 inhibited sub-
`stance P (SP)-induced peripheral effects (skin reactions and
`plasma extravasation in guinea pigs) and a central effect (thump-
`ing in gerbils) at low doses (0.08–0.16 mg/kg, s.c. or i.p.), reflect-
`ing its high potency as an NK
`1 receptor antagonist and excellent
`brain disposition. Higher doses blocked various emetic stimuli in
`ferrets, cats, and dogs (ED
`50 values: 3.2 mg/kg, s.c.; 0.72–2.5
`mg/kg, p.o.). Even higher doses (11–25 mg/kg, s.c.) were required
`in mice (capsaicin-induced ear edema) and rats (SP-induced ex-
`travasation and salivation), consistent with lower affinity for the
`rodent NK
`1 receptor and known species differences in NK1 re-
`ceptor interactions. R116301 inhibited the ocular discharge (0.034
`mg/kg) but not the dyspnoea, lethality, or cough (/H1102240 mg/kg, s.c.)
`induced by [
`/H9252ALA8]-neurokinin A (NKA) (4–10) in guinea pigs,
`attesting to NK 1 over NK2 selectivity. R116301 did not affect
`senktide-induced miosis (/H110225 mg/kg, s.c.) in rabbits, confirming
`the absence of an interaction with the NK3 receptor. R116301 was
`inactive in guinea pigs against skin reactions induced by hista-
`mine, platelet-aggregating factor, bradykinin, or Ascaris allergens
`(/H1102210 mg/kg, s.c.). In all species, R116301 showed excellent oral
`over parenteral activity (ratio, 0.22–2.7) and a relatively long dura-
`tion (6.5–16 h, p.o.). The data attest to the specificity and sensi-
`tivity of the animal models and support a role of NK
`1 receptors in
`various diseases.
`Tachykinins belong to a family of short peptides that are
`widely distributed in the mammalian central and peripheral
`nervous system (Lundberg, 1995; Maggi, 1995; Bertrand and
`Geppetti, 1996). They share the common C-terminal se-
`quence Phe-Xaa-Gly-Leu-Met-NH
`2. Tachykinins released
`from peripheral sensory nerve endings are believed to be
`involved in neurogenic inflammation. In the spinal cord/cen-
`tral nervous system, tachykinins may play a role in pain
`transmission/perception and in some autonomic reflexes and
`behaviors. The three major tachykinins are substance P (SP),
`neurokinin (NK) A and NKB with preferential affinity for
`three distinct receptor subtypes, termed NK
`1,N K2, and NK3,
`respectively. However, functional studies on cloned receptors
`suggest strong functional cross-interaction between the three
`Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at
`http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
`DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.034348.
`ABBREVIATIONS:SP, substance P; NK, neurokinin; NKA, neurokinin A; R116301, (2R-trans)-4-[1-[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl]-2-(phenylmethyl)-4-
`piperidinyl]-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-1-acetamide ( S)-hydroxybutanedioate; CGP49823, (2 R,4S)-2-benzyl-1-(3,5-dimethylbenzoyl)-4-(quinolin-4-
`ylmethylamino)piperidine; CP-96345, (2S,3S)-cis-2-(diphenylmethyl)-N-((2-methoxyphenyl)-methyl)-1-azabicyclo(2.2.2.)-octan-3-amine; CP-99994, (2S,3S)-3-
`(2-methoxybenzylamino)-2-phenylpiperidine; GR-203040, (2S,3S)-(2-methoxy-5-tetrazol-1-ylbenzyl)(2-phenylpiperidin-3-yl)amine; MK-869 or L-754030,
`aprepitant; L-760,735, 2-(R)-(1-(R)-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)ethoxy)-4-(5-(dimethylaminomethyl)-1,2,3-trioazol-4-yl)methyl-3-(5)-phenyl)morpholine; RP-
`67580, (3aR,7aR)-7,7-diphenyl-2-[1-imino-2-(2-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]perhydroisoindol-4-one; SDZ-NKT-343, 2-nitrophenylcarbamoyl-(S)-prolyl-(S)-3-(2-
`naphthyl)alanyl-N-benzyl-N-methylamide; SR-140333, nolpitantium; SR-48968, saredutant; SR-142801, osanetant; Y-24180, (/H11006)-4-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-[2-(4-
`isobutylphenyl)ethyl]-6,9-dimethyl-6H-thieno[3,2-f][1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]diazepine; LY255582, (3R,4R)-3,4-dimethyl-1-[(3S)-3-hydroxy-3-cyclohexyl-propyl]-
`4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine; PAF, platelet-aggregating factor; 5-HT, serotonin; MDL-103392, 4-piperidinecarboxamide, 1-[2-[3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-(3,4,5-
`trimethoxybenzoyl)-3-pryrrolidinyl]ethyl]-4-phenyl; MDL-105212, (3R)-MDL-103392.
`0022-3565/02/3022-696–709$7.00
`THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Vol. 302, No. 2
`Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 34348/996964
`JPET 302:696–709, 2002 Printed in U.S.A.
`696
`HELSINN EXHIBIT 2066
`Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Helsinn Healthcare S.A.
`IPR2025-00948
`Page 1 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tachykinins and their corresponding receptors (Maggi and
`Schwartz, 1997). The tachykinins are involved in emesis,
`anxiety states (stress-related), smooth muscle contraction,
`inflammation, and nociception/pain perception, although
`clinically relevant involvement of SP, particularly for the last
`items, is questionable (Hill, 2000).
`R116301 is a new NK
`1 receptor antagonist (Fig. 1 ). The
`present study reports on its pharmacological profile in sev-
`eral NK receptor-related models in various species. Species
`differences in the structure of NK
`1 receptors are responsible
`for species-related potency differences of NK1 receptor antag-
`onists (Maggi, 1995). The human NK1 receptor closely resem-
`bles the NK 1 receptor of guinea pigs and gerbils but differs
`markedly from the NK1 receptor of rodents. Therefore, most
`tests are performed in guinea pigs and gerbils. Attention is
`paid to potency, selectivity, specificity, onset and duration of
`action, and species differences. R116301 is compared with
`the following available NK
`1 receptor antagonists (Fig. 1 for
`chemical structures): CGP49823 (Vassout et al., 1994), CP-
`96345 (Snider et al., 1991), CP-99994 (Piedimonte et al.,
`1993), GR-203040 (Ward et al., 1995), MDL-103392 (race-
`mate of the active enantiomer MDL-105212; Kudlacz et al.,
`1996), aprepitant (MK-869 or L-754030; Kramer et al., 1998;
`Rupniak and Kramer, 1999), L-760735 (McAllister et al.,
`Fig. 1. Chemical structure of R116301 [(S)-hydroxybutanedioate salt] and the reference NK 1 receptor antagonists.
`Pharmacology of R116301 697
`Page 2 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1999), RP-67580 (Garret et al., 1991), SDZ-NKT-343 (Wal-
`pole et al., 1998), nolpitantium (SR-140333; Emonds-Alt et
`al., 1993). The testing of some compounds was restricted by
`limited availability. The sensitivity, reliability, and specific-
`ity of the various test models is evaluated based on the
`results obtained with the test compounds. A preliminary
`article on R116301 has been presented in poster format
`(Jurzak et al., 2000). A patent application has been filed
`(Janssens et al., 1997).
`Materials and Methods
`Animals
`Swiss mice (Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium), Wistar
`rats (Janssen Pharmaceutica), Mongolian CRW gerbils ( Meriones
`unguiculatus; Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc., Sulzteld,
`Germany), Dunkin-Hartley-Purbright guinea pigs (Janssen Phar-
`maceutica or Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc.), Fish ferrets
`(Harlan CPB, Horst, The Netherlands), New Zealand white rabbits
`(Broekman Institute, Someren, The Netherlands), cats (Broekman
`Institute), and Beagle dogs (Janssen Pharmaceutica or Harlan CPB)
`were used. They were fasted overnight (tap water remained avail-
`able ad libitum) and housed under standard laboratory conditions
`(21 /H110062°C; 65 /H1100615% relative humidity; light/dark cycle set at 12 h).
`During the test period, they were housed in individual cages. The
`ferrets, cats, and dogs were used more than once, with an intertrial
`interval of at least 1 week. All animal studies were approved by the
`local Ethical Committee in compliance with the Declaration of Hel-
`sinki.
`Chemicals and Test Compounds
`R116301 was dissolved up to 2.5 mg/ml in 10% hydroxypropyl- /H9252-
`cyclodextrin. Higher doses were prepared as suspensions in 1% poly-
`sorbate 80 in distilled water. The preparations were stored at room
`temperature in closed containers protected from light. They were
`studied at various time intervals after subcutaneous (10 ml/kg for
`mice, rats, and guinea pigs; 1.0 ml/kg for rabbits; 0.5 ml/kg for cats
`and dogs), oral (10 ml/kg for mice, rats, and guinea pigs; 1.0 ml/kg for
`rabbits; 0.5 ml/kg for cats and dogs), or intravenous administration
`(10 ml/kg for mice; 2 ml/kg for rats; 0.5 ml/kg for rabbits, cats, and
`dogs). All doses were expressed in milligram base equivalents per
`kilogram body weight. With the exception of aprepitant (L-754030 or
`MK-869; synthesized by and obtained from Johnson & Johnson
`Pharmaceutical Research Institute and Development, Springhouse,
`NJ) and L-760735 (synthesized by our Department of Medicinal
`Chemistry), the reference compounds were kindly provided by the
`companies of origin: CGP49823 and SDZ-NKT-343 (Novartis, Basel,
`Switzerland); CP-96345 and CP-99994 (Pfizer, Sandwich, Kent, UK);
`GR-203040
`(GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK); MDL-103392 (Aven-
`tis, Strasbourg, France); RP-67580 (Aventis); saredutant/SR-48968,
`nolpitantium/SR-140333, and osanetant/SR-142801 (SANOFI Re-
`search Center, Montpellier, France). For all these compounds with
`exception of SR-140333 and SDZ-NKT-343, some batches were syn-
`thesized in our Department of Medicinal Chemistry. The origin of
`the other chemicals is indicated in parentheses after each name:
`substance P (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), [
`/H9252ALA8]-neurokinin A
`(4–10) (NovaBiochem, Laufelfingen, Switzerland), capsaicin (Sigma-
`Aldrich), PAF (Sigma-Aldrich), bradykinin (Sigma-Aldrich), hista-
`mine (Sigma-Aldrich), and Evans blue dye (Sigma-Aldrich; Direct
`blue 53; dye content approximately 85%). Ascaris suum worms were
`obtained from freshly slaughtered pigs. A batch of about 20 ml of
`perienteric fluid was centrifuged; the clear supernatant was divided
`in 0.1-ml portions and stored at /H1100218°C. The injected solutions of
`Ascaris coeloma fluid were fresh 1:16 dilutions in 0.9% NaCl.
`Pharmacological Tests
`In Vitro Receptor Binding. Membrane preparation from cells.
`Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human (h)NK1,N K2 or NK3
`receptors were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/HAM’s
`F-12 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum and antibiotics. Twen-
`ty-four hours after stimulation with 5 mM Na-butyrate to enhance
`expression levels, the cells were collected from plates using a rubber
`scraper and suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. They were
`centrifuged at 23,500g for 10 min in a Sorvall-RC 5B centrifuge
`(DuPont Instruments, Meyvis, Belgium). The pellets were homoge-
`nized in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, using an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer
`(Janke & Kunkel IKA Labortechnik, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany)
`and centrifuged at 30,000g for 20 min. The final pellet was sus-
`pended in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. The membranes were frozen in
`1-ml aliquots /H1100270°C. Before use, vials were thawed and rehomog-
`enized in incubation buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 2
`mM MgCl
`2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin). The
`protein concentration was determined after using a Bradford kit
`from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA).
`Membrane preparation from brain tissue. To prepare membranes
`for [
`3H]substance P binding from guinea pigs, gerbils, ferrets, and
`rats, animals were killed by decapitation, and the forebrains were
`dissected. The tissue was homogenized in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4,
`using an Ultra-Turrax homogenizer. The homogenates were centri-
`fuged at 23,500g for 10 min at 0 –4°C in a Sorvall-RC 5B centrifuge.
`The pellets were washed twice in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, by
`resuspension with a dual-homogenizer (Kimble Kontes, Vineland,
`NJ) and centrifugation. After the last wash, the pellets were sus-
`pended in incubation buffer A [50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing
`2 mM MgCl
`2, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM o-phenantrolin, and 0.1% bovine
`serum albumin at a dilution of 25 volumes/original wet weight of
`tissue (v/w)]. The final pellet of rat forebrain was suspended in
`incubation buffer B at a dilution of 40 v/w. Guinea pig, gerbil, and rat
`forebrain membranes were always freshly prepared. For ferret fore-
`brain, the membranes were prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4,
`and stored at a dilution of 5 v/w at /H1100270°C. Before use, these mem-
`branes were thawed and further diluted until dilution of 25 v/w in
`incubation buffer A.
`[
`3H]Substance P binding to NK1 receptors and data analysis. The
`membrane homogenates were incubated for 20 min at 25°C with 0.5
`nM [
`3H]SP (for rat membranes 1 nM was used) in a total volume of
`0.5 ml. Specific binding of the radioligand was distinguished from
`nonspecific binding by addition of unlabeled SP to a final concentra-
`tion of 10
`/H110027M. The incubation was stopped by the addition of 5 ml of
`ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, followed by rapid filtration
`over Whatman GF/B glass fiber filters (Maidstone, Kent, UK) (pre-
`soaked in 0.1% polyethylenimine for 1 h) using a 40-well filtration
`unit. The filters were washed twice with ice-cold buffer to remove
`nonbound radioactivity and placed in plastic miniature vials. After a
`24-h incubation with 2 ml of Ultima Gold scintillation cocktail, vials
`were vigorously shaken, and the radioactivity was counted in a
`Packard Tri-Carb 1500 CA liquid scintillation analyser (Packard
`BioScience, Meriden, CT).
`R116301 was also investigated in various other in vitro binding
`assays using membrane preparations of animal tissue or membranes
`of cell lines transfected with cloned human receptors. Brain, periph-
`eral organs, blood of animal or human origin, or permanent cell lines
`were used as tissue sources. The procedures for membrane prepara-
`tions and references to the various receptor binding models were
`described previously (Briejer et al., 2001).
`Substance P-Induced Plasma Protein Extravasation in
`Guinea Pigs. SP (2
`/H9262g/kg, i.v.) and Evans blue dye (30 mg/kg, i.v.)
`were injected simultaneously (one solution; 4 ml/kg) into the femoral
`artery of guinea pigs of both sexes (325– 425 g) at predefined, loga-
`rithmically spaced, time intervals (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32 h) after
`pretreatment with test compound or solvent. Up to 10 min after
`challenge, the animals were scored by visual inspection for blue
`698 Megens et al.
`Page 3 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`coloring (0, 1, 2, or 3) of the nose, the forepaws, and the conjunctiva.
`The criterion for drug-induced inhibition of plasma extravasation:
`score /H110212 (occurrence in 0.2, 0.0, and 0.0% for blue coloring of the
`nose, paws, and conjunctiva, respectively, in saline-treated controls;
`n /H11005500).
`Capsaicin-Induced Ear Edema in Mice. Ear edema was in-
`duced by local application of capsaicin (250
`/H9262g) on the ear of female
`mice (20 –26 g) pretreated with test compound or solvent (modified
`after Inoue et al., 1996). The capsaicin was dissolved in acetone at a
`concentration of 12.5 mg/ml and applied in a volume of 10
`/H9262l both on
`the ventral and dorsal side of the left ear. Pure acetone was applied
`in a volume of 10
`/H9262l both on the ventral and dorsal side of the right
`ear, which served as a control measure. Immediately after the cap-
`saicin challenge, Evans blue dye (7.5 mg/ml in 0.9% NaCl) was
`injected intravenously in a volume of 10 ml/kg, corresponding to a
`dose of 75 mg/kg. Thirty minutes after the capsaicin application, ear
`edema was scored (0, 1, 2, or 3) as the blue coloring of the left ear.
`Criterion for drug-induced inhibition: score /H110212 (never observed in
`controls; n /H1100562).
`Substance P-Induced Salivation and Plasma Protein Ex-
`travasation in Rats. Plasma protein extravasation and salivation
`were induced by injection of SP (2
`/H9262g/4 ml/kg, i.v.) in the tail vein of
`female rats (200 –240 g) that were anesthetized with pentobarbital
`(40 mg/kg, i.p.; 10 min before the SP challenge) and placed on a
`heating pad to maintain body temperature [modified after Snider et
`al. (1991); Robineau et al. (1995)]. Evans blue dye (30 mg/kg, i.v.) was
`injected simultaneously with SP (one solution; 4 ml/kg). Test com-
`pound or solvent was administered at a predefined time interval
`before SP injection. From 0 through 4 min after the SP challenge,
`salivation was measured by placing cotton swabs in the rat ’s mouth
`at 2-min intervals and quantifying the amount of saliva secreted by
`the difference in the weight of the two cotton swabs before and after
`the collection period. Five minutes after challenge, the animals were
`scored for blue coloring (0, 1, 2, or 3) of the nose and the paws. Thirty
`minutes after challenge, the animals were sacrificed by CO
`2 asphyx-
`iation and scored (0, 1, 2, or 3) for blue coloring of the trachea and
`urinary bladder. Criteria for drug-induced inhibition: /H11021100 mg of
`saliva for inhibition of salivation (2.0% in controls;n /H11022100); score /H110212
`for inhibition of plasma extravasation (0, 0, 1.0, and 1.0 for blue
`coloring of the nose, paws, trachea, and urinary bladder, respec-
`tively, in controls).
`Skin Reaction Test in Guinea Pigs: SP, Histamine, PAF,
`Bradykinin, and Ascaris Allergens. Five dorsal skin sites of
`guinea pigs of both sexes (300 –500 g) were injected intradermally
`(0.05 ml) with saline containing SP (0.05
`/H9262g), histamine (0.25 /H9262g),
`PAF (0.00625 /H9262g), bradykinin (0.1 /H9262g), and Ascaris allergens (1/16
`diluted with saline). Immediately thereafter, the animals were chal-
`lenged i.v. with Evans blue dye (30 mg/kg; 7.5 mg/ml, 4 ml/kg) and
`sacrificed 30 min later. The intensity of the blue-colored skin reac-
`tions was scored by two independent observers in comparison with
`standard reactions. The scoring system was maximal (4), pronounced
`(3), moderate (2), slight (1), and no difference (0) with surrounding
`skin. The scores of the two observers were summed for further
`evaluation. Test compound or solvent was administered at a pre-
`defined interval before induction of the skin reactions. Criteria for
`drug-induced effects were: 1) SP reactions: score /H110217 for inhibition,
`score /H110215 for pronounced inhibition, and score/H110213 for blockade (oc-
`curring in 3.6, 0.0, and 0.0%, respectively, of solvent-treated control
`guinea pigs; n /H1100557); 2) histamine reactions: score /H110217 for inhibition
`and score /H110213 for blockade (occurring in 3.6% and 0.0%, respectively,
`of the controls); 3) PAF reactions: score /H110217 for inhibition and score
`/H110213 for blockade (both occurring in 0.0% of the controls); and 4)
`bradykinin reactions: score /H110217 for inhibition and score/H110213 for block-
`ade (both occurring in 0.0% of the controls); and 5) Ascaris allergens
`reactions: score /H110213 for blockade (occurring in 5.4% of the controls).
`SP-Induced Thumping in Gerbils. Male gerbils (50–70 g) were
`prepared for intracerebral injection under anesthesia (exposure to
`4% isoflurane in 70% N
`2O /H1100130% O2 during 1 min) by making an
`incision in the skin above the cranium (modified after Bristow and
`Young, 1994 and Rupniak et al., 1997). SP (400 ng in 2 /H9262l) was
`rapidly injected into the cerebral ventricles after advancing a Ham-
`ilton needle 3.5 mm below a point 2 mm anterior to bregma and 1 mm
`lateral to the midline; the needle was removed 10 s later. The
`animals were observed for thumping behavior during the following 5
`min. Thumping was defined as a sharp downward movement of the
`hind-paws producing a characteristic rhythmic tapping sound. The
`onset of the SP-induced thumping, the total number of thumps, and
`the total thumping time (seconds) were registered. The animals were
`then immediately euthanized with CO
`2. For the present purpose,
`absence of thumps during the 5-min observation period was adopted
`as an all-or-nothing criterion for inhibition of the SP-induced thump-
`ing (1.2% false positive controls; n /H11005625).
`[
`/H9252ALA8]-NKA (4–10)-Induced Lethality in Guinea Pigs. The
`following phenomena were scored or noted after injection of [/H9252ALA8]-
`neurokinin A (4 –10) (50 /H9262g/4 ml/kg; i.v.) into the vena saphena of
`female guinea pigs (300 –500 g) pretreated with test compound or
`solvent: cough (intensity scores: 0, 1, or 2), white ocular discharge
`(scores: 0, 1, or 2), dyspnoea (score 1 /H11005cyanosis, score 2 /H11005dyspnoea,
`score 3 /H11005loss of righting reflex and/or clonic convulsions), and
`lethality (the survival time up to 60 min after [
`/H9252ALA8]-NKA (4 –10)
`challenge is noted) (modified after Robineau et al., 1995). [ /H9252ALA8]-
`neurokinin A (4 –10) is a metabolism-resistant analog of neuroki-
`nin-A with a high degree of selectivity for the NK 2 receptor (Rovero
`et al., 1989). The various phenomena generally occurred within 3 to
`5 min after the [
`/H9252ALA8]-NKA (4–10) challenge. The following all-or-
`nothing criteria were adopted for the determination of the ED 50
`values of the test compounds: score /H110050 for antagonism of cough
`(occurrence: 0.0% false positives in the control population; n /H1100596),
`score /H110050 for antagonism of ocular discharge (2.1% false positives),
`score /H110212 for protection from dyspnoea (1.0% false positives), and
`survival time /H1102260 min for protection from lethality (5.2% false pos-
`itives).
`Emesis in Ferrets, Cats, and Dogs. Vomiting or retching was
`induced by the peripherally selective opioid loperamide (0.31 mg/kg,
`s.c.), by ipecac syrup (1 ml/kg, p.o.; from a commercial source and
`containing ether-soluble alkaloids of ipecac in a concentration of 1.4
`mg/ml), by the dopamine agonist apomorphine (0.31 mg/kg, s.c.), or
`by the
`/H92512-adrenoceptor agonist xylazine (1.25 mg/kg, s.c.) in male
`ferrets (1–3 kg), cats (3–7 kg), or dogs (5–20 kg) pretreated with test
`compound or solvent. The number of retches or vomits was counted
`over a 1 h-period or (in the case of ipecac syrup-induced emesis in
`cats) a 3 h-period starting immediately after the emetic challenge.
`Loperamide-induced retching in ferrets. In control animals pre-
`treated with solvent, loperamide (0.31 mg/kg, s.c.) induced pro-
`nounced retching (mean /H11006S.D.: 95 /H1100639 counts; n /H11005529) and, to a
`lesser extent, vomiting (5 /H110064). All-or-nothing criteria for drug-
`induced effects on retching: /H1102120 retches for inhibition (2.0% false
`positives) and 0 retches for blockade (0% false positives).
`Ipecac syrup-induced retching in ferrets. Oral administration of
`ipecac syrup induced pronounced retching (mean /H11006S.D.: 76 /H1100636
`counts) and, to a lesser extent, vomiting (mean /H11006S.E.: 5.6 /H110062.3
`counts; n /H1100598) in control animals. Absence of retching or vomiting
`never occurred in these control animals and was used as criterion for
`antiemetic activity.
`Apomorphine-induced retching in ferrets.Injection of apomorphine
`resulted in pronounced retching in control ferrets (mean/H11006S.D.: 63 /H11006
`29 counts; n /H1100592) and, to a lesser extent, vomiting (mean /H11006S.D.:
`3.1 /H110062.0 counts). Absence of retching never occurred in these control
`animals and was used as criterion for antiemetic activity. Vomiting
`was absent in 13% of the control animals.
`Apomorphine-induced vomiting in dogs. Apomorphine induced
`consistent vomiting in all control dogs (mean /H11006S.D.: 10 /H110065 vomits;
`n /H11005195). Criteria for drug-induced protection: inhibition of emesis:
`/H110212 emetic bouts (occurring in 0.12% of controls); blockade of emesis:
`complete absence of emesis (not observed in controls).
`Xylazine-induced retching in cats. Control cats (n /H11005113) retched
`Pharmacology of R116301
`699
`Page 4 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(mean /H11006S.D.: 41 /H1100618 counts) and vomited (mean /H11006S.D.: 2.9 /H110061.8
`counts) after injection of xylazine. Absence of retching or vomiting
`never occurred and was used as criterion for antiemetic activity.
`Ipecac syrup-induced vomiting in cats. Oral administration of ip-
`ecac syrup induced vomiting and retching during a 3-h observation
`period in control cats pretreated with distilled water (n /H1100530). For
`practical reasons, only the number of emetic bouts was counted,
`which remained relatively low (mean /H11006S.E.: 4.5 /H110060.6 counts).
`Absence of vomiting never occurred and was used as the criterion for
`antiemetic activity.
`Senktide-Induced Miosis in Rabbits. Senktide (12.5
`/H9262g/0.5
`ml/kg, i.v.)-induced miosis was evaluated just before and 15 min
`after challenge in male New Zealand white rabbits (approximately 1
`kg) pretreated with test compound or solvent (1.0 ml/kg) (modified
`after Medhurst et al., 1997). The senktide was injected into an ear
`vein. The left pupil of each rabbit was measured under normal
`ambient lighting with a comparing reticule (scaled to 0.5 mm). In
`solvent-pretreated control rabbits (n /H1100573), pupil diameter declined
`from 6.0 /H110060.5 mm immediately before to 2.7 /H110060.7 mm 15 min after
`the senktide challenge. At this 15-min time interval after senktide
`injection, only two of the control rabbits (2.7%) showed a pupil
`diameter /H113505.0 mm, which was adopted as all-or-nothing criterion for
`significant inhibition of the senktide-induced miosis by test com-
`pounds.
`General Procedure and Statistics
`In Vitro Binding Studies. Sigmoidal inhibition curves were
`calculated by computerized nonlinear regression analyses according
`to Oestreicher and Pinto. pIC
`50 values (/H11002log concentration producing
`50% inhibition of specific [ 3H]SP binding) were derived. Inhibition
`equilibrium constants (K i values) were calculated according to Ki
`(nanomolar) /H11005IC50/(1 /H11001C/Kd), where C is the concentration and Kd
`the equilibrium dissociation constant of the [ 3H]SP.
`In Vivo Functional Studies.All experiments were performed by
`unbiased trained technicians using coded solutions. Doses were se-
`lected from the geometrical series 0.00063–0.00125–0.0025. . . 40.0–
`80.0–160 mg/kg in such a way that at least three doses covered the
`0 to 100% effect range of the dose-response curve. Each dose group
`consisted of five animals, which were tested in separate daily exper-
`imental sessions (including solvent-treated control animals) to ac-
`count for day-to-day variability and to minimize systematic errors.
`Control injections of solvent were included in each experimental
`session. Based on an analysis of a frequency distribution of a large
`series of the historical control data, all-or-nothing criteria for stim-
`ulation or inhibition were defined as a change of the measured or
`scored variable to values that never or almost never (in less than 5%)
`occurred in the control population. With the help of the thus defined
`all-or-nothing criteria, graded data were transformed to categorical
`data which generated per dose level the number of animals in which
`the intensity of a particular phenomenon was higher (stimulation) or
`lower (inhibition or blockade) than in the control animals. On the
`basis of the thus obtained dose-response relations, ED
`50 values and
`corresponding 95% confidence limits were calculated by probit anal-
`ysis according to the method of Finney (1962) for categorical data.
`Results
`In Vitro Receptor Binding Profile
`R116301 showed subnanomolar affinity for the human
`NK1 receptor (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 8.53 /H110060.06; Ki: 0.45 nM; n /H110054
`replicates), with 230- and 1600-fold selectivity regarding
`binding to the human NK3 (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 6.22 /H110060.14; Ki: 104
`nM; n /H110053) and NK2 (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 5.87 /H110060.36; Ki: 711 nM;
`n /H110054) receptors, respectively. R116301 showed very low
`affinity for human serotonin 5-HT 2B (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 5.68 /H11006
`0.15; Ki: 928 nM;n /H110052) and 5-ht5a (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 5.16 /H110060.04;
`Ki: 3544 nM; n /H110052) receptors and for rat Ca2/H11001ligand binding
`sites (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 5.45 /H110060.15; Ki: 2454 nM; n /H110053) and Na/H11001
`channels (pIC50 /H11006S.D.: 5.60 /H110060.17; Ki: 2526 nM; n /H110053). Up
`to 10 /H9262M, the compound had no affinity for a wide range of
`other binding sites, including adrenergic receptors (human
`/H92511A-, /H92512A-, /H92512B-, /H92512C-, /H92521-, /H92522-, /H92523-), dopaminergic (rat D 1;
`human D 2L,D 3, and D 4), serotonergic (human 5-HT 1A,
`5-HT1B, 5-HT 1D, 5-ht 1e, 5-ht 1f, 5-HT 2A, 5-HT 2C, 5-HT 3,
`5-HT4b, and 5-HT 7), human histamine H 1, rat cholinergic
`muscarinic, transporters (rat DA, NE; human 5-HT, GlyT 1,
`and GlyT 2), aspartate (rat NMDA-MK801, NMDA-glycine,
`and AMPA), opioid (human /H9262, /H9254; guinea pig /H9260), human halo-
`peridol-sensitive /H92681, peptide receptors (rat CCK A; human
`CCKB, bradykinin-B2, VIP). Since tachykinin receptors are
`known to exhibit strong species dependence in pharmacology,
`the NK1 affinity of R116301 was investigated on tissue mem-
`brane preparations from forebrains of guinea pigs, gerbils,
`ferrets, and rats. Relative to its affinity for the human NK
`1
`receptor, R116301 showed about 10 times lower affinity for
`the gerbil, ferret, and guinea pig NK
`1 receptors (Ki: 6.4, 8.3,
`and 13 nM, respectively) and 200 times lower affinity for the
`rat NK
`1 receptor (K i: 98 nM). These results show a high
`affinity, selectivity, and specificity of R116301 for the human
`NK
`1 receptor and a species preference as generally observed
`for other NK1 receptor antagonists as well.
`Fig. 2. Individual scores (ranging from 0 to 3) for SP-induced blue
`coloring of the nose, forepaws, and conjunctiva of guinea pigs 1 h after s.c.
`pretreatment with saline (n/H1100510) or various doses of R116301 (n/H110055/dose
`group). The individual scores are represented by small, white, vertical
`bars (5/dose group) on a black background. In this way, the degree of
`inhibition can be readily estimated from the visible area of black back-
`ground.
`700 Megens et al.
`Page 5 of 14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Inhibition of SP-Induced Plasma Extravasation in Guinea
`Pigs
`Figure 2 shows individual scores (ranging from 0 to 3) for
`the SP-induced plasma extravasation in the nose, forepaws,
`and conjunctiva of guinea pigs 1 h after s.c. pretreatment
`with saline (n /H1100510) or various doses of R116301 (n /H110055/dose
`group). R116301 reduced the scores dose dependently for
`blue coloring in the three organs. The ED
`50 values for reduc-
`ing the scores below 2 were 0.097, 0.11, and 0.085 mg/kg for
`the nose, forepaws, and conjunctiva, respectively (Table 1).
`Table 1 compares R116301 with other NK
`1 receptor antag-
`onists at the indicated time interval after s.c., p.o., or i.v.
`administration. Regarding inhibition of extravasation in the
`nose after s.c. injection, R116301 (0.097 mg/kg) was 31 times
`less potent than GR-203040 (0.0031 mg/kg) but about equi-
`potent with aprepitant (0.028 mg/kg), nolpitantium (0.050
`mg/kg), CP-99994 (0.17 mg/kg), and CP-96345 (0.22 mg/kg).
`The p.o. over s.c. ED
`50 ratio was much better for R116301
`(2.7) and aprepitant (3.0) than for CP-96345 (12), CP-99994
`(124), GR-203040 (190), and the quaternary compound nol-
`pitantium (/H1102250).
`At 4 times the peak-effect dose (graphical estimated: 0.27
`mg/kg), R116301 showed a rapid onset (/H110211 h) and a relatively
`long duration of action (16 h; Fig. 3). In contrast, activity had
`already appreciably declined 4 h after s.c. injection of nolpi-
`tantium or p.o. administration of CP-96345 (Table 1). The
`rat-selective NK
`1 receptor antagonist RP-67580 hardly in -
`hibited extravasation in guinea pigs at the dose of 10 mg/kg,
`s.c. After an s.c. dose of 40 mg/kg, the NK
`2 receptor antago-
`nist saredutant (40 mg/kg, s.c.), the NK3 receptor antagonist
`osanetant (/H1102240 mg/kg, s.c.), and the histamine H1 receptor
`antagonists oxatomide and levocabastine did not at all affect
`the SP-induced plasma extravasation at doses far above the
`dose required for their primary activity.
`Skin Reaction Test in Guinea Pigs: SP, Histamine,
`PAF, and Bradykinin. R116301 (s.c., /H110022 h) was compared
`with the histamine H
`1 receptor antagonist levocabastine
`Fig. 3. ED50 (milligrams per kilogram) of R116301 for inhibition of
`SP-induced extravasation in the nose plotted versus time interval after
`oral administration. Vertical bars represent the 95% confidence limits to
`the ED
`50 values.
`TABLE 1
`ED50 values (95% CL; milligrams per kilogram) of R116301 and reference NK 1 receptor antagonists for inhibition of SP-induced extravasation in
`guinea-pigs
`Compound Route Time
`ED50 (95% C

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket