throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. https://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1277078
`
`Filing date:
`
`04/07/2023
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`91283724
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Defendant
`UTOPBAN LIMITED
`
`NA ZHANG
`GLACIER LAW LLP
`506 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 1516
`SEATTLE, WA 98104
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: queena.zhang@glacier.law
`Secondary email(s): tao.liu@glacier.law, wei.wang@glacier.law,
`mickey.yao@glacier.law, ruoting.men@glacier.law, iris.ju@glacier.law
`(206) 397-8633
`
`Answer
`
`Na Zhang
`
`queena.zhang@glacier.law, tao.liu@glacier.law, wei.wang@glacier.law,
`mickey.yao@glacier.law
`
`/Na Zhang/
`
`04/07/2023
`
`Attachments
`
`TTAB Vegega Applicant Answer.pdf(446740 bytes )
`
`

`

`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`--------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`VEGO GARDEN INC.,
`
`
` -v-
`
`UTOPBAN LIMITED,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91283724
`Serial No. 97189569
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mark:
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`APPLICANT’S ANSWER TO OPPOSER’S NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`The following is the Answer of Applicant Utopban Limited (hereinafter “Utopban”
`
`or “Applicant”) to the Notice of Opposition filed by Vego Garden Inc. (hereinafter “Opposer”)
`
`filed on March 1, 2023 and assigned Opposition No.91283724. Applicant hereby answers
`
`solely for the purpose of this proceeding, to each of the grounds set forth in the Notice of
`
`Opposition, as follows:
`
`1. Opposer Vego Garden, Inc. (“Vego”) has continuously used, since at least as early as
`
`January 2020, the VEGO GARDEN mark to identify the source of its raised garden beds and
`
`gardening-related products. For years, Vego has used—and continues to use—the trademarks
`
`VEGO and VEGO GARDEN, alone and in combination with other terms and designs
`
`(“Vego’s Marks”), in connection with an extensive range of goods and services, including:
`
`raised garden beds, bags, trellises, seedling trays, nets, lights, knives, sifters, composters,
`
`planters, mugs, and garden bed covers. Vego also provides educational programs under the
`
`VEGO mark. The foregoing goods and services are collectively referred to as “Vego’s Goods
`
`and Services.”
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 1 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`2. Vego owns nationwide common law trademark rights in Vego’s Marks in connection
`
`with Vego’s Goods and Services by virtue of the use of Vego’s Marks throughout the United
`
`States. Vego established such common law rights in Vego’s Marks prior to any date of first
`
`use or priority upon which Applicant can rely.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 2 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`3. Vego is the owner of the following federally registered trademarks that incorporate
`
`Vego’s Marks:
`
`(chart omitted)
`
`The foregoing registrations are collectively referred to as “Vego’s Registrations.” Current
`
`printouts of information from the electronic database of records of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office showing the current status and title of Vego’s Registrations are attached as
`
`Exhibit 1 and are made record in this Opposition.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 3 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`4. All of Vego’s Registrations are valid, subsisting, and in full force and effect; all serve
`
`as prima facie evidence of the validity of the marks shown and of Vego’s exclusive right to use
`
`the marks on the goods identified, 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b); all establish that Vego’s rights in
`
`Vego’s Marks is long-prior to any rights on which Applicant can rely; and all serve to place
`
`Applicant on notice of Vego’s rights. In addition, all of Vego’s Registrations are incontestable
`
`and are conclusive evidence of Vego’s exclusive right to use the mark identified on the goods
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`specified therein pursuant to Sections 7 and 33 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1057, 1115(b).
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 4 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`5. Vego sells its VEGO-branded products online on its website at www.vegogarden.com,
`
`and through third-party retailers such as Lowe’s, Home Depot, Walmart, and online at
`
`Amazon.com.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 5 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`6. Vego has gone to considerable expense and expended substantial amounts of time and
`
`effort in advertising and promoting its goods and services offered under Vego’s Marks. Vego
`
`uses a combination of traditional promotional efforts, direct advertising, word-of-mouth, and
`
`unsolicited advertising as vehicles to promote its products. The goods and services offered
`
`under Vego’s Marks have been recognized by consumers and the trade for excellence in the
`
`United States. As a result of such promotional activities and unsolicited recognition, Vego’s
`
`Marks have become well-known in the United States in connection with Vego’s Goods and
`
`Services. The relevant public associates and identifies Vego’s Marks with Vego, and Vego
`
`derives substantial goodwill from such identification by consumers
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 6 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`7. As the popularity of Vego’s Goods and Services has grown, so have the number of
`
`incidents of unauthorized copying. Vego has implemented a worldwide program to deal with
`
`counterfeits of its products and infringements of its famous Vego Marks. Vego goes to great
`
`lengths to police the marketplace and enforce Vego’s Marks in order to protect the public from
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`deception and confusion, as well as to protect the core of the company, its employees,
`
`customers, and all who manufacture, distribute, promote, and sell genuine VEGO- and VEGO
`
`GARDEN-branded products.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 7 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`Applicant and the VEGEGA. (stylized) Application
`
`8. Upon information and belief, applicant UTOPBAN LIMITED (“Applicant”) is a
`
`limited company organized and existing under the laws of Hong Kong with an address of Unit
`
`2 22/F Richmond Comm, Bldg. 109 Argyle Street, Mongkok KL Hong Kong 999077.
`
`ANSWER: Admitted.
`
`9. On December 24, 2021, Applicant filed a U.S. Trademark Application Serial No.
`
`97189569 VEGEGA. (stylized) (the “VEGEGA Mark”), under Section 1(a) of the Lanham Act,
`
`covering “Flower and plant cultivation trays; Garden syringes; Holders for flowers and plants;
`
`Plant baskets; Planter boxes for domestic gardening; Planters for flowers and plants; Plastic
`
`lids for plant pots; Raised garden beds, namely, raised containers for planting contained
`
`gardens; Raised garden planters; Self-watering planters for flowers and plants” in International
`
`Class 21 (“Applicant’s Goods”), and claiming that it first used the VEGEGA Mark in United
`
`States commerce in connection with Applicant’s Goods on December 23, 2021.
`
`ANSWER: Admitted.
`
`10. In support of his first use claim, Applicant submitted a screenshot showing use of the
`
`VEGEGA Mark on its website at www.vegega.com, where the prefix element “VEGE” is
`
`shown in green, and “GA.” element appears in red, screenshot below. Upon information and
`
`belief, the “vege” element refers to “vegetable,” and the “ga” element refers to “garden.”
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`ANSWER: Applicant admitted the prefix element “VEGE” of the “VEGEGA Mark” is
`
`shown in green and the “GA.” element of the “VEGEGA Mark” appears in red. Applicant
`
`denied the remaining of the allegations in paragraph 10 as the “VEGEGA Mark” contains
`
`various meanings.
`
`11. Vego has received a number of consumer inquiries regarding the status of orders from
`
`customers who had placed orders for Applicant’s products bearing the VEGEGA Mark,
`
`believing that they were purchasing Vego’s VEGO-branded products
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 11 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`12. On or about September 12, 2022, Vego requested that the United States International
`
`Trade Commission commence an investigation into Applicant, and related companies,
`
`pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. § 1337, to remedy
`
`unlawful importation into the United States the sale raised garden beds and components that
`
`were manufactured using Vego’s trade secrets, marketed using Vego’s registered copyrighted
`
`works, and for unfair competition through false advertising and passing off (the “Section 337
`
`Action”). The Section 337 Action is pending.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant admitted the Section 337 Action is pending but denied Vego’s
`
`allegations against Applicant with regard to unlawful importation into the United States the
`
`sale raised garden beds and components that were manufactured using Vego’s trade secrets,
`
`marketed using Vego’s registered copyrighted works, and for unfair competition through false
`
`advertising and passing off in in paragraph 12 of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`COUNT I
`LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`13. Vego repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1
`
`through 12, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`ANSWER: Paragraph 13 contains allegations to which no response is required. To the
`
`extent a response is required, Applicant denies the allegations contained in the paragraph 13 of
`
`the Notice of Opposition.
`
`14. Vego’s rights in Vego’s Marks are prior in time and superior in renown to any rights
`
`that Applicant may claim in the VEGEGA Mark, in any form or style.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`15. The VEGEGA Mark combines dominant VEG- element of each of Vego’s Marks with
`
`the word “GA,” which suggests gardening products sold under the VEGEGA Mark belong to
`
`or are associated with Vego. Consumers will therefore believe that any product bearing the
`
`VEGEGA Mark originate with Vego
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`16. Vego’s Goods and Services and Applicant’s Goods sell identical and garden related
`
`products that travel in and are promoted through the same channels of trade for sale to, and use
`
`by, the same classes of consumers
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`17. Accordingly, the registration of Applicant’s VEGEGA Mark is likely to cause
`
`consumer confusion, mistake, or to deceive the public into believing that Applicant’s Goods
`
`originate with or are somehow affiliated or associated with, connected to or sponsored by
`
`Vego, in violation of Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d).
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`18. If Applicant is permitted to register or use the mark herein opposed, there would likely
`
`be confusion as to the origin or sponsorship of the goods, resulting in damage and injury to
`
`Vego. Persons familiar with Vego’s Marks will be likely to purchase Applicant’s Goods,
`
`believing them to be affiliated or associated with, connected to or sponsored by Vego.
`
`Likewise, persons exposed to Applicant’s VEGEGA Mark who subsequently become
`
`acquainted with Vego’s Marks are likely to conclude that the goods offered by Vego under
`
`Vego’s Marks are in some manner affiliated or associated with, connected to or sponsored by
`
`Applicant. Any such confusion as to sponsorship inevitably would result in damage and injury
`
`to Vego
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`19. Vego will be damaged by registration of Applicant’s VEGEGA Mark because such
`
`registration would support and assist Applicant in the confusing and misleading use of
`
`Applicant’s mark, give color of legal right to Applicant in violation of Vego’s prior and
`
`superior statutory and common law rights in Vego’s Marks
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`WHEREFORE, Applicant prays that the Notice of Opposition be dismissed with
`
`prejudice.
`
`
`
`
`Date: 4/6/2023
`
`
`
`/s/ Na Zhang
`Na Zhang, Esq
`GLACIER LAW LLP
`506 Second Ave., Ste 1516
`Seattle, WA 98104
`queena.zhang@glacier.law
`206-397-8633
`
`Ruoting Men, Esq.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`GLACIER LAW LLP
`200 E. Randolph Dr., Ste. 5100
`Chicago, IL 60601
`ruoting.men@glacier.law
`312-270-0413
`
`Mickey Yao, Esq.
`Glacier Law LLP
`251 South Lake Ave, Suite 910
`Pasadena, CA 91101
`Mickey.yao@glacier.law
`323-546-6766
`
`Wei Wang, Esq.
`GLACIER LAW LLP
`41 Madison Avenue, Suite 2529
`New York, NY 10010
`wei.wang@glacier.law
`332-777-7315
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`It is hereby certified that a true copy of the foregoing Applicant’s Answer to
`
`Opposer’s Notice of Opposition was served upon Opposer by email, on this 6th day of April
`
`2023, at the following address:
`
`
`H. STRAAT TENNEY
`LOCKE LORD LLP
`200 VESEY STREET
`NEW YORK, NY 10281
`UNITED STATES
`trademark@lockelord.com, straat.tenney@lockelord.com, ziwen.zhu@lockelord.com,
`christina.london@lockelord.com, laura.campbell@lockelord.com
`Phone: 212-912-2915
`
`By: /s/Na Zhang
`Na Zhang, Esq
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Dated: April 6, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket