`
`ESTTA1307545
`
`Filing date:
`
`08/31/2023
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`91283724
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Defendant
`Utopban Limited
`
`NA ZHANG
`GLACIER LAW LLP
`506 SECOND AVENUE SUITE 1516
`SEATTLE, WA 98104
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: queena.zhang@glacier.law
`Secondary email(s): tao.liu@glacier.law, wei.wang@glacier.law,
`mickey.yao@glacier.law, ruoting.men@glacier.law, iris.ju@glacier.law
`206-397-8633
`
`Answer
`
`Na Zhang
`
`queena.zhang@glacier.law, tao.liu@glacier.law, mickey.yao@glacier.law,
`wei.wang@glacier.law
`
`/Na Zhang/
`
`08/31/2023
`
`Attachments
`
`TTAB Vegega Amended Answer.pdf(469987 bytes )
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`--------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`VEGO GARDEN INC.,
`
`
` -v-
`
`UTOPBAN LIMITED,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91283724
`Serial No. 97189569
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mark:
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------X
`
`
`APPLICANT’S AMENDED ANSWER TO OPPOSER’S FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF
`OPPOSITION
`
`
`
`The following is the Amended Answer of Applicant Utopban Limited (hereinafter
`
`“Utopban” or “Applicant”) to the First Amended Notice of Opposition filed by Vego Garden
`
`Inc. (hereinafter “Opposer”) filed on June 23, 2023 and assigned Opposition No.91283724.
`
`Applicant hereby answers solely for the purpose of this proceeding, to each of the grounds set
`
`forth in the First Amended Notice of Opposition, as follows:
`
`
`
`1. Opposer Vego Garden, Inc. (“Vego”) has continuously used, since at least as early as
`
`January 2020, the VEGO GARDEN mark to identify the source of its raised garden beds and
`
`gardening-related products. For years, Vego has used—and continues to use—the trademarks
`
`VEGO and VEGO GARDEN, alone and in combination with other terms and designs
`
`(“Vego’s Marks”), in connection with an extensive range of goods and services, including:
`
`raised garden beds, bags, trellises, seedling trays, nets, lights, knives, sifters, composters,
`
`planters, mugs, and garden bed covers. Vego also provides educational programs under the
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`VEGO mark. The foregoing goods and services are collectively referred to as “Vego’s Goods
`
`and Services.”
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 1 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`2. Vego owns nationwide common law trademark rights in Vego’s Marks in connection
`
`with Vego’s Goods and Services by virtue of the use of Vego’s Marks throughout the United
`
`States. Vego established such common law rights in Vego’s Marks prior to any date of first
`
`use or priority upon which Applicant can rely.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 2 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`3. Vego is the owner of the following federally registered trademarks that incorporate
`
`Vego’s Marks:
`
`(chart omitted)
`
`The foregoing registrations are collectively referred to as “Vego’s Registrations.” Current
`
`printouts of information from the electronic database of records of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office showing the current status and title of Vego’s Registrations are attached as
`
`Exhibit 1 and are made record in this Opposition.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 3 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`4. All of Vego’s Registrations are valid, subsisting, and in full force and effect; all serve
`
`as prima facie evidence of the validity of the marks shown and of Vego’s exclusive right to use
`
`the marks on the goods identified, 15 U.S.C. § 1057(b); all establish that Vego’s rights in
`
`Vego’s Marks is long-prior to any rights on which Applicant can rely; and all serve to place
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant on notice of Vego’s rights. In addition, all of Vego’s Registrations are incontestable
`
`and are conclusive evidence of Vego’s exclusive right to use the mark identified on the goods
`
`specified therein pursuant to Sections 7 and 33 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1057, 1115(b).
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 4 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`5. Vego sells its VEGO-branded products online on its website at www.vegogarden.com,
`
`and through third-party retailers such as Lowe’s, Home Depot, Walmart, and online at
`
`Amazon.com.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 5 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`6. Vego has gone to considerable expense and expended substantial amounts of time and
`
`effort in advertising and promoting its goods and services offered under Vego’s Marks. Vego
`
`uses a combination of traditional promotional efforts, direct advertising, word-of-mouth, and
`
`unsolicited advertising as vehicles to promote its products. The goods and services offered
`
`under Vego’s Marks have been recognized by consumers and the trade for excellence in the
`
`United States. As a result of such promotional activities and unsolicited recognition, Vego’s
`
`Marks have become well-known in the United States in connection with Vego’s Goods and
`
`Services. The relevant public associates and identifies Vego’s Marks with Vego, and Vego
`
`derives substantial goodwill from such identification by consumers.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 6 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`7. As the popularity of Vego’s Goods and Services has grown, so have the number of
`
`incidents of unauthorized copying. Vego has implemented a worldwide program to deal with
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`counterfeits of its products and infringements of its famous Vego Marks. Vego goes to great
`
`lengths to police the marketplace and enforce Vego’s Marks in order to protect the public from
`
`deception and confusion, as well as to protect the core of the company, its employees,
`
`customers, and all who manufacture, distribute, promote, and sell genuine VEGO- and VEGO
`
`GARDEN-branded products.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 7 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`Applicant and the VEGEGA. (stylized) Application
`
`8. Upon information and belief, applicant UTOPBAN LIMITED (“Applicant”) is a
`
`limited company organized and existing under the laws of Hong Kong with an address of Unit
`
`2 22/F Richmond Comm, Bldg. 109 Argyle Street, Mongkok KL Hong Kong 999077.
`
`ANSWER: Admitted.
`
`9. On December 24, 2021, Applicant filed a U.S. Trademark Application Serial No.
`
`97189569 VEGEGA. (stylized) (the “VEGEGA Mark”), under Section 1(a) of the Lanham Act,
`
`covering “Flower and plant cultivation trays; Garden syringes; Holders for flowers and plants;
`
`Plant baskets; Planter boxes for domestic gardening; Planters for flowers and plants; Plastic
`
`lids for plant pots; Raised garden beds, namely, raised containers for planting contained
`
`gardens; Raised garden planters; Self-watering planters for flowers and plants” in International
`
`Class 21 (“Applicant’s Goods”), and claiming that it first used the VEGEGA Mark in United
`
`States commerce in connection with Applicant’s Goods on December 23, 2021.
`
`ANSWER: Admitted.
`
`10. In support of his first use claim, Applicant submitted a screenshot showing use of the
`
`VEGEGA Mark on its website at www.vegega.com, where the prefix element “VEGE” is
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`shown in green, and “GA.” element appears in red, screenshot below. Upon information and
`
`belief, the “vege” element refers to “vegetable,” and the “ga” element refers to “garden.”
`
`ANSWER: Applicant admitted that it submitted a drawing with its trademark
`
`application as shown below. Applicant denied the remaining of the allegations in paragraph 10
`
`as the “VEGEGA Mark” holds various meanings.
`
`
`
`11. Applicant is using the VEGO and VEGO GARDEN trademarks in sponsored
`
`advertisements on search results pages, including on the Google search engine. A screenshot
`
`
`
`of one of Applicant’s sponsored advertisements is shown below.
`
`(screenshot omitted)
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`12. Upon information and belief, Applicant’s uses the VEGO and VEGO GARDEN mark
`
`in its online advertisements to direct consumers who search for Vego’s products into believing
`
`mistakenly that they are visiting Vego’s website.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`13. Vego has received a number of consumer inquiries regarding the status of orders from
`
`customers who had placed orders for Applicant’s products bearing the VEGEGA Mark,
`
`believing that they were purchasing Vego’s VEGO-branded products.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant is without knowledge as to the allegations in paragraph 13 of the
`
`Notice of Opposition and therefore denies the same.
`
`14. On or about September 12, 2022, Vego requested that the United States International
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`Trade Commission commence an investigation into Applicant, and related companies,
`
`pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. § 1337, to remedy
`
`unlawful importation into the United States the sale raised garden beds and components that
`
`were manufactured using Vego’s trade secrets, marketed using Vego’s registered copyrighted
`
`works, and for unfair competition through false advertising and passing off (the “Section 337
`
`Action”). The Section 337 Action is pending.
`
`ANSWER: Applicant admitted the Section 337 Action is pending but denied Vego’s
`
`allegations against Applicant with regard to unlawful importation into the United States the
`
`sale raised garden beds and components that were manufactured using Vego’s trade secrets,
`
`marketed using Vego’s registered copyrighted works, and for unfair competition through false
`
`advertising and passing off in in paragraph 14 of the Notice of Opposition.
`
`COUNT I
`Likelihood Of Confusion
`
`15. Vego repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1
`
`through 12, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`ANSWER: Paragraph 15 contains allegations to which no response is required. To the
`
`extent a response is required, Applicant denies the allegations contained in the paragraph 15 of
`
`the Notice of Opposition.
`
`16. Vego’s rights in Vego’s Marks are prior in time and superior in renown to any rights
`
`that Applicant may claim in the VEGEGA Mark, in any form or style.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`17. The VEGEGA Mark combines dominant VEG- element of each of Vego’s Marks with
`
`the word “GA,” which suggests gardening products sold under the VEGEGA Mark belong to
`
`or are associated with Vego. Consumers will therefore believe that any product bearing the
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`VEGEGA Mark originate with Vego
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`18. Vego’s Goods and Services and Applicant’s Goods sell identical and garden related
`
`products that travel in and are promoted through the same channels of trade for sale to, and use
`
`by, the same classes of consumers
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`19. Accordingly, the registration of Applicant’s VEGEGA Mark is likely to cause
`
`consumer confusion, mistake, or to deceive the public into believing that Applicant’s Goods
`
`originate with or are somehow affiliated or associated with, connected to or sponsored by
`
`Vego, in violation of Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d).
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`20. If Applicant is permitted to register or use the mark herein opposed, there would likely
`
`be confusion as to the origin or sponsorship of the goods, resulting in damage and injury to
`
`Vego. Persons familiar with Vego’s Marks will be likely to purchase Applicant’s Goods,
`
`believing them to be affiliated or associated with, connected to or sponsored by Vego.
`
`Likewise, persons exposed to Applicant’s VEGEGA Mark who subsequently become
`
`acquainted with Vego’s Marks are likely to conclude that the goods offered by Vego under
`
`Vego’s Marks are in some manner affiliated or associated with, connected to or sponsored by
`
`Applicant. Any such confusion as to sponsorship inevitably would result in damage and injury
`
`to Vego.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`21. Vego will be damaged by registration of Applicant’s VEGEGA Mark because such
`
`registration would support and assist Applicant in the confusing and misleading use of
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant’s mark, give color of legal right to Applicant in violation of Vego’s prior and
`
`superior statutory and common law rights in Vego’s Marks.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`COUNT II
`Misuse of Federal Registration Symbol with Intent to Deceive
`
`22. Vego repeats and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in Paragraphs 1
`
`through 21, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`ANSWER: Paragraph 22 contains allegations to which no response is required. To the
`
`extent a response is required, Applicant denies the allegations contained in the paragraph 22 of
`
`the Notice of Opposition.
`
`23. Applicant has used and is currently using the federal registration symbol (®) with the
`
`VEGEGA. (stylized) mark in connection with the advertising and sale of Applicant’s Products,
`
`even though the mark is not registered in the U.S.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`24. Upon information and belief, Applicant has used the federal registration symbol (®)
`
`with an intent to deceive the purchasing public and others in the trade into believing that
`
`Applicant’s Mark is registered. Therefore, the application must be refused because of
`
`fraudulent misuse of the federal registration symbol.
`
`ANSWER: Denied.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Applicant prays that the Notice of Opposition be dismissed with
`
`prejudice.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 8/31/2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Na Zhang
`Na Zhang, Esq
`GLACIER LAW LLP
`506 Second Ave., Ste 1516
`Seattle, WA 98104
`queena.zhang@glacier.law
`206-397-8633
`
`
`Attorney for Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`It is hereby certified that a true copy of the foregoing Applicant’s Amended Answer
`
`to Opposer’s First Amended Notice of Opposition was served upon Opposer by email, on this
`
`31st day of August 2023, at the following address:
`
`
`H. STRAAT TENNEY
`LOCKE LORD LLP
`200 VESEY STREET
`NEW YORK, NY 10281
`UNITED STATES
`trademark@lockelord.com, straat.tenney@lockelord.com, ziwen.zhu@lockelord.com,
`christina.london@lockelord.com, laura.campbell@lockelord.com
`Phone: 212-912-2915
`
`By: /s/Na Zhang
`Na Zhang, Esq
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Dated: August 31, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`



